robots.txt & llms.txt across the Tranco top 1M
Data as of 2026-09-07 · robots.txt via Common Crawl CC-MAIN-2026-34 + our polite crawl · llms.txt via our polite crawl · Tranco list XN67N (2026-09-03T22:00:02.533886) · 1,000,000 panel domains 1,212,578 robots.txt fetches · 740,113 parsed · 56,498 llms.txt probes

Two public profiles · no score or winner

emerald.com and zetaglobal.net

emerald.com #5,756 zetaglobal.net #5,757

Measured takeaway

Both sites allow AI-search crawlers.

Measured in Botfy's 2026-09-07 publication.

At a glance

A difference appears only when both sites have comparable evidence. Unavailable or unresolved observations remain incomplete.

Evidenceemerald.com zetaglobal.net
robots.txt Served and parsed Served and parsed
Google crawl posture Open Open
Unnamed crawler fallback Partly Restricted they inherit the wildcard (*) group's rules Allowed the wildcard (*) group is effectively open
Base /llms.txt Not probed Published

Treatment by purpose

Only resolved blocked, allowed, or mixed states count as a policy agreement or difference. Unnamed agents still inherit each site's wildcard rules.

Declared purposeemerald.com zetaglobal.net
Model training Not explicitly addressed Allowed
AI search Allowed Allowed
Live assistant fetch Allowed Allowed
Opt-out directives Not explicitly addressed Not explicitly addressed
Ambiguous / undocumented Not explicitly addressed Not explicitly addressed

Named agents

Measured differences appear first. “Not explicitly addressed” is not the same as allowed; the site's wildcard fallback governs that crawler.

Agentemerald.com zetaglobal.net
OAI-SearchBot OpenAI Allowed Allowed
ChatGPT-User OpenAI Allowed Allowed
Claude-User Anthropic Allowed Allowed
Perplexity-User Perplexity Allowed Allowed
ClaudeBot Anthropic Not explicitly addressed Allowed
Claude-SearchBot Anthropic Not explicitly addressed Allowed
PerplexityBot Perplexity Not explicitly addressed Allowed

How each site compares with its own rank peers

The sites may belong to different rank bands. Each percentage keeps its own population and denominator; Botfy does not subtract rates from unlike cohorts.

Traitemerald.com zetaglobal.net
Wildcard group Yes 94.1% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437 Yes 94.1% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437
Effectively open file No 16.4% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437 Yes 16.4% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437
Sitemap declared Yes 65.6% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437 Yes 65.6% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437
robots.txt served Yes 60.7% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=9,037 Yes 60.7% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=9,037
robots.txt returned 404 No 5.4% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=9,037 No 5.4% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=9,037
Over the RFC parse limit No 0.2% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437 No 0.2% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437
Blanket disallow No 3.7% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437 No 3.7% Ranks 1,001–10,000 · n=5,437
How this comparison is measured

Both sites use Botfy's latest published observations. A missing fetch, unresolved agent verdict, and measured absence are different states. Peer percentages use each site's exclusive Tranco rank band and print their own denominator. Populations, sources, and limits →

Keep comparing

Each suggestion replaces one side using an editorial collection or current rank proximity. Neither means the sites have similar policies.